Am I the only one who thinks flying to get to disneyland Paris is easier than the train?
Is it just me, or does flying to Disneyland Paris seem easier than taking the train? We live in the southeast of England, and the train option requires either heading to London the night before and staying overnight or making our way to Euston during rush hour.
Then there’s the trip from St Pancras to Lille (if I’m recalling correctly) and a transfer involved.
On the other hand, we have a quick trip to London Luton, a flight to CDG, and then just a short train ride directly to the park entrance.
Am I overlooking something?
You’re definitely not alone in thinking that flying might be easier! For many, the convenience of a direct flight, especially when traveling with luggage or kids, can outweigh the hassle of train transfers. Plus, the train journey can sometimes be stressful, especially with the potential for delays during peak hours.
Flying from a nearby airport like Luton can save time and energy, particularly if you can align your flight times well with the train schedules after landing. And the train ride from CDG to Disneyland is pretty straightforward too, which adds to the appeal.
However, some people might prefer the train for its comfort and the lack of security hassles compared to flying. It all comes down to personal preference and what you value more in your travel experience! Have you found that flying saves you time overall, or is it more about the convenience for you?